
Throughout the course, I have significantly improved in all areas of the research to practice process. Through every new post, I improved my ability to detail my observations, questions, research, and reflections. In my first blog post, I separated each section in the post according to the areas. In doing this, I was unable to form a cohesive story. Instead, my post read as boring, textbook information, which was not my goal at all. I made strong improvements in each individual section as well. In addition, my first blog post had a very informational title, while my second, third, and fourth blog posts had titles that captured the reader much more.
To start, my observations have drastically improved, probably more than any other area of the process. My first observation simply stated what I saw, and I did not elaborate on my observation in the form of a story. I did not try to delve deeper into the implications that could have come with the observation. As I mentioned previously, it simply reads as way too textbook-like and not like a narrative. In my second blog post, I started to create a story within my post. I started my observation with asking the audience if they have ever felt frustration after not being able to accomplish something, and then I went into my observation that revolved around this same subject. I also brought in my own past experiences about this topic and how I felt about it. Then, in my fourth blog post, I continued with creating a story out of my post and I introduced the topic of the post through my observation. I explained what I saw while also beginning a cohesive storyline in my observation. I was also able to better connect my observation to the questions and research at this point. Overall, from my first blog post to my fourth blog post, I was able to strongly connect my observations to the other aspects of the research to practice process (question, research, reflection). In addition, I was able to create a cohesive narrative introduced through my observations, as well as describe my observations in much more reader friendly language.
I vastly improved in the question area of the research to practice process as well. In my first blog post, I simply stated many of the questions that I came up with from my observation. It was a very logical process, and I separated the questions I made from the rest of the post and I did not integrate them well throughout the blog post. In my second blog post, I combined my questioning with the observation in order to create more cohesiveness and to connect my questions more thoroughly to my observations, so they directly intertwined. I also spoke to the reader more through my questions. I did not just simply state my questions, instead I connected them to real life and asked the reader the same questions pertaining to real life situations. In my fourth blog post, I really pushed the narrative and storytelling with my questioning. Once again, I connected my question to the observation and to real life situations. My question was about how we raise the confidence of children, so I connected that to many situations in real life where people perform better when they are confident. For example, I talked about the heavily popular phrase “fake it until you make it” because it resonates with many people. My questioning and how I integrated it within my blog post greatly improved from my first post to my last post.
For the research portion of the research to practice process, I started off in my first blog post by going through how I found my article, step by step. In reading this over, after I learned how to create a story out of the posts, it is very boring to read. I even described how I broke down my question into key terms to search for the article. This is not reader friendly at all. However, I was able to move past that in my second blog post and skip discussing how I searched for my article and went straight into the content of my research. I talked about how the research could be applied in the classroom and how motivating students (the topic of my post and research) benefits everyone involved. In my third blog post (I did the research portion of this group post), I was able to more comfortably mention the author’s name and elaborate on their research in a casual way. I was able to successfully integrate my research findings into the blog post and keep the flow of the narrative, which was about our science center at Eshleman Elementary School. My fourth blog post was basically perfecting the research process and seamlessly weaving it into my post. Throughout this process, I feel like finding an appropriate article and including that research into my blog post became easier with each new post. I think, by the fourth post, my research really helped to tie all of the content together and form a strong argument.
The reflection aspect of the research to practice process is where I think I improved the least. I do think that by my fourth blog post my reflections became more well thought-out, however I still struggled with integrating it into the rest of the post. In each of my blog posts, I have the reflection separated from the rest of my post. I could not figure out how to include it with the rest of my sections while still maintaining cohesiveness. I did not think I could authentically include it and I did not want it to feel forced to the reader. One aspect I improved upon with my reflection is reflecting about the process of research to practice, and how I think I grew from each process. I do think that this process has allowed me to think more intrinsically about my work.
When it comes to technology, I am a bit regretful that I never used a different form of technology for my blog posts besides written text. I used written text for all four blog posts, simply transferring the text to my blog and posting it there. I would have liked to try doing a podcast, however the opportunity just did not end up working out time-wise. I think it would have been fun to do a video post as well, but I would have definitely been nervous showing my face. On the bright side, using written text for my blog every time was good practice for when I will have to write to parents and administrators in the future.
If I were to experience this research to practice project again, I would do several things differently. Firstly, I would use a different technology for each of my blog posts. I would try out the podcast and vlog, because I think it would be fun to use those technologies. Another thing I would do differently is record my observations in more detail as I am seeing them in the field. I would do this because it would provide more information to write about in my blog and I would not have trouble remembering things from the field. In addition, I would make sure to write my blog posts as a cohesive story in the first place.
There are many things I learned throughout this research to practice project that I will take away for my future teaching practice. First, I now know the importance of the research I have conducted for these posts. For example, my first blog post was about the developmental significance of free play. I now know how incredibly important free play is for all children and I will be sure to always include free play in my classroom. Then, in my fourth blog post I discussed the importance of confidence in children. The research I conducted for the post showed me how confidence in children actually raises their performance in the classroom. This is another thing I can take with me in the future. I will always make sure my students feel confident. In addition, this process has prepared me for the future research and write-ups that I will need to conduct for my professional development.
There are a few pieces of advice I would give to the next ERCH 496 students pertaining to the research to practice project. Firstly, I would advise them to explore different technological choices for their blog posts. I would suggest not just doing the written text like I, and many of my peers, did. It is a good experience to become familiar with other methods of technology. Secondly, I would advise them to plan their blog post as a cohesive story from the start. I think separating the observation, question, research, and reflection parts of the post is a mistake even when just gathering information and writing down your thoughts. Plan it as a story from the beginning and it will be easier to write it as a story when the post is made. Lastly, I would suggest to all the students to write down their observations extensively as they are in the field. This will ensure that they have more content to research and write about later. Overall, I would explain the value of the research to practice project to us, as future educators.

